News & Results

Favorable Sentence for Ponzi Scheme Defendant

In United States v. Gillis, the Firm represented the lead defendant, Joel Gillis, who was charged with operating one of the largest Ponzi schemes in Southern California history.  After receiving nearly $300 million in investor proceeds through his company, Nationwide Automated Systems, Inc. (NASI), Mr. Gillis retained the Firm to handle sentencing issues.  The charged scheme alleged that Mr. Gillis had falsely told investors their money would be used for automated teller machines (ATMs) that would generate at least a 20 percent profit annually.  The government sought a 20-year sentence pursuant to the United States Sentencing Guidelines, but the Court imposed half that sentence after crediting the Firm’s presentation of issues as the basis for imposing this remarkable departure from the sentence that would otherwise have been required by law.

Spertus, Landes & Josephs, LLP

  • West LA
    1990 S Bundy Drive
    Suite 705
    Los Angeles, CA 90025
    • Phone: (310) 826-4700
    • Fax: (310) 826-4711
  • Downtown LA
    617 West 7th Street
    Suite 200
    Los Angeles, CA 90017
    • Phone: (213) 205-6520
    • Fax: (213) 205-6521

©2025 Spertus, Landes & Josephs, LLP. All rights reserved.
Committed to WCAG 2.1 AA Accessibility Compliance.

Trade name disclosure: After 17 years of phenomenal client service, our former name partner Ezra D. Landes no longer practices law with the firm as of April 30, 2024.

These web pages have been prepared by Spertus, Landes & Josephs, LLP for informational purposes only. Nothing on this website is intended to constitute legal advice, and you should not rely upon any information in these web pages as a source of legal advice. Receipt of information by you from this website does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Spertus, Landes & Josephs, LLP. Further, if you communicate with Spertus, Landes & Josephs, LLP or with one of our attorneys through this website, or otherwise by e-mail or other means, your communication will not create an attorney-client relationship with us and the attorney-client privilege will not necessarily apply to your communications.